Abstract
H1 Patent – European patent – Treatment for multiple sclerosis – Revocation – Validity – Construction – Obviousness – Inventive step – Whether post-dated evidence admissible in identifying technical contribution – Whether technical contribution plausible – Whether any technical contribution in fact – Burden of proof – Insufficiency – Meaning of “approximately” – Declaration of non-infringement – Whether allegedly infringement fell within the claimed range – Validity upheld – Declaration of non-infringement refused – Appeal to Court of Appeal
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
