Abstract
The conventional soil organic matter (SOM) decay paradigm considers the intrinsic quality of SOM as the dominant decay limitation with the result that it is modelled using simple first-order decay kinetics. This view and modelling approach is often criticized for being too simplistic and unreliable for predictive purposes. It is still under debate if first-order models can correctly capture the variability in temporal SOM decay observed between different agroecosystems and climates. To address this question, we calibrated a first-order model (Q) on six long-term bare fallow field experiments across Europe. Following conventional SOM decay theory, we assumed that parameters directly describing SOC decay (rate of SOM quality change and decomposer metabolism) are thermodynamically constrained and therefore valid for all sites. Initial litter input quality and edaphic interactions (both local by definition) and microbial efficiency (possibly affected by nutrient stoichiometry) were instead considered site-specific. Initial litter input quality explained most observed kinetics variability, and the model predicted a convergence toward a common kinetics over time. Site-specific variables played no detectable role. The decay of decades-old SOM seemed mostly influenced by OM chemistry and was well described by first order kinetics and a single set of general kinetics parameters.
Highlights
The conventional soil organic matter (SOM) decay paradigm considers the intrinsic quality of SOM as the dominant decay limitation with the result that it is modelled using simple first-order decay kinetics
The decay of Soil organic carbon (SOC) is described in most current models with first order kinetics, with additional modifiers to represent the effects of other factors
Community have strongly promoted the inclusion of higher order kinetics[7,14], where the rate of SOC loss is a function of SOC multiplied by a variable kinetic term, itself a function of SOC, of microbial biomass, or of other factors
Summary
The conventional soil organic matter (SOM) decay paradigm considers the intrinsic quality of SOM as the dominant decay limitation with the result that it is modelled using simple first-order decay kinetics. The decay of SOC is described in most current models with first order kinetics (where the rate of loss is defined by SOC stocks multiplied by a kinetic term, so losses are in absolute terms proportional only to SOC stocks), with additional modifiers to represent the effects of other factors These can be considered time-varying, such as climate drivers, or constant, such as texture. Conventional first-order models can still represent a local ( constant over time) variation of metabolic parameters by varying the decay rates as a function of other factors (e.g. texture or nutrients) or with a discrete classification of model parameters related to ecosystem or soil type This brings us to the key question of this work: how far can we push first-order SOC models in order to describe the variability of C dynamics in agroecosystems? Such inputs constantly modify SOC quality and can cause nonlinear effects on SOC kinetics, in particular under significant priming[18], which if present would be more problematic to represent for a first-order model
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
