Abstract

Individual tree detection (ITD) and the area-based approach (ABA) are combined to generate tree-lists using airborne LiDAR data. ITD based on the Canopy Height Model (CHM) was applied for overstory trees, while ABA based on nearest neighbor (NN) imputation was applied for understory trees. Our approach is intended to compensate for the weakness of LiDAR data and ITD in estimating understory trees, keeping the strength of ITD in estimating overstory trees in tree-level. We investigated the effects of three parameters on the performance of our proposed approach: smoothing of CHM, resolution of CHM, and height cutoff (a specific height that classifies trees into overstory and understory). There was no single combination of those parameters that produced the best performance for estimating stems per ha, mean tree height, basal area, diameter distribution and height distribution. The trees in the lowest LiDAR height class yielded the largest relative bias and relative root mean squared error. Although ITD and ABA showed limited explanatory powers to estimate stems per hectare and basal area, there could be improvements from methods such as using LiDAR data with higher density, applying better algorithms for ITD and decreasing distortion of the structure of LiDAR data. Automating the procedure of finding optimal combinations of those parameters is essential to expedite forest management decisions across forest landscapes using remote sensing data.

Highlights

  • IntroductionTemesgen planning such as tree species, diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (HT), basal area (BA) and stem volume

  • Individual tree detection (ITD) based on the Canopy Height Model (CHM) was applied for overstory trees, while area-based approach (ABA) based on nearest neighbor (NN) imputation was applied for understory trees

  • We examined the effects of the combination of the three parameters, smoothing of CHM, resolution of CHM and the height cutoff, as well as light detection and ranging (LiDAR) height classification of field plots on estimating tree-lists via ITD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Temesgen planning such as tree species, diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (HT), basal area (BA) and stem volume. Remote sensing data can be used as auxiliary information to improve the accuracy and precision of estimates in forest inventory. LiDAR has performed well in estimating forest attributes such as biomass (Næsset & Gobakken, 2008), diameter distribution (Gobakken & Næsset, 2004), volume and BA (Lindberg & Hollaus, 2012). Tree-lists have been estimated by LiDAR (Lindberg, Holmgren, Olofsson, Wallerman, & Olsson, 2010, 2013) or aerial photographs (Temesgen, LeMay, Froese, & Marshall, 2003)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call