Abstract

Abstract. Tillage is a central element in agricultural soil management and has direct and indirect effects on processes in the biosphere. Effects of agricultural soil management can be assessed by soil, crop, and ecosystem models, but global assessments are hampered by lack of information on the type of tillage and their spatial distribution. This study describes the generation of a classification of tillage practices and presents the spatially explicit mapping of these crop-specific tillage systems for around the year 2005. Tillage practices differ by the kind of equipment used, soil surface and depth affected, timing, and their purpose within the cropping systems. We classified the broad variety of globally relevant tillage practices into six categories: no-tillage in the context of Conservation Agriculture, traditional annual, traditional rotational, rotational, reduced, and conventional annual tillage. The identified tillage systems were allocated to gridded crop-specific cropland areas with a resolution of 5 arcmin. Allocation rules were based on literature findings and combine area information on crop type, water management regime, field size, water erosion, income, and aridity. We scaled reported national Conservation Agriculture areas down to grid cells via a probability-based approach for 54 countries. We provide area estimates of the six tillage systems aggregated to global and country scale. We found that 8.67 Mkm2 of global cropland area was tilled intensively at least once a year, whereas the remaining 2.65 Mkm2 was tilled less intensely. Further, we identified 4.67 Mkm2 of cropland as an area where Conservation Agriculture could be expanded to under current conditions. The tillage classification enables the parameterization of different soil management practices in various kinds of model simulations. The crop-specific tillage dataset indicates the spatial distribution of soil management practices, which is a prerequisite to assess erosion, carbon sequestration potential, as well as water, and nutrient dynamics of cropland soils. The dynamic definition of the allocation rules and accounting for national statistics, such as the share of Conservation Agriculture per country, also allow for derivation of datasets for historical and future global soil management scenarios. The resulting tillage system dataset and source code are accessible via an open-data repository (DOIs: https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.009 and https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.010, Porwollik et al., 2019a, b).

Highlights

  • Introduction to tillageGlobal cropland covers an area of about 15 Mkm2 (Ramankutty et al, 2008), which is approximately 13 % of global ice-free land

  • The aridity index was calculated as the average yearly precipitation divided by the average yearly potential evapotranspiration (PET), based on Climate Research Unit (CRU) CL 2.0 climate data averaged for the years from 1961 to 1990 applying the Penman–Monteith method

  • In high-income countries or in a grid cell reporting field sizes larger than 2 ha situated in low-income countries, perennial cropland was assigned to rotational tillage and annual cropland to conventional annual tillage assuming a rather commercially oriented farming system with access to market, financial capital, and mechanized soil management equipment (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction to tillage

Global cropland covers an area of about 15 Mkm (Ramankutty et al, 2008), which is approximately 13 % of global ice-free land. More process-based representations of the tillage effect are applied in models such as the decision support system for agrotechnology transfer–cropping system model (DSSAT– CSM, White et al, 2010) and the crop growth simulator (CROPGRO-soybean, Andales et al, 2000) with direct and indirect biophysical effects on soil, water, crop yield, and emissions Another field of global-scale studies assessing the tillage effect refers to the analysis of albedo enhancement perceived in cases of no-tillage in conjunction with associated increased residue levels left on the soil surface (Hirsch et al, 2017; Lobell et al, 2006). Further we analyze underlying causes of the occurrence of different tillage systems and make use of available data in order to map them to a global grid of 5 arcmin resolution

Tillage system classification
Datasets used for mapping tillage systems to the grid
Processing of input data and mapping rules
Mapping rules for downscaling CA
Logit model for downscaling national CA
Mapping CA area per country
Scenario CA area
Spatial pattern of six tillage systems
The results of the logit model
Results of the sensitivity analysis of the logit model
Downscaled CA area
Findings
Comparison of results to other studies
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call