Abstract
Recently, Susilo et al.'s perfect concurrent signature scheme (PCS1) and Wang et al.'s improved perfect concurrent signature scheme (iPCS1) are proposed, which are considered as good improvements on concurrent signatures, and they adopt the same algorithms. In this paper, we develop generic perfect concurrent signature algorithms of which Susilo et al. and Wang et al.'s algorithms turn out to be a special instance. We also obtain numerous new, efficient variants from the generic algorithms which have not been proposed before. To display the advantage of these variants, a modified privacy-preserving PCS protocol is given. It shows that the new variants adapt to the protocol well and can form concrete privacy-preserving PCS schemes, while the original algorithms do not. Security proofs and efficiency analysis are also given.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
