Abstract

This article critically analyzes a contradiction in the accreditation process of BSW programs. While the standards mandate that undergraduate social work education must prepare students for beginning generalist practice, they concurrently mandate that the results of systematic outcome evaluations must inform program planning and curriculum design. When a program’s outcome measures indicate that students upon graduation perform primarily direct practice, case management functions, must the curriculum reflect this emphasis rather than an even-handed generalist approach? This contradiction raises the issue of the relative priority of standards and the reality of social work practice in the marketplace.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.