Abstract

Investigations tackling the production techniques used by ancient potters often rely upon experimental archaeology to clarify the relationship between surface morphology, surface topography, and the techniques, methods, and gestures used in the potting process. These experimental archaeology programmes focus on creating collections of experimental vessels to compare against archaeologicallyrecovered vessels, thus allowing production techniques to be identified. Often times, however, the typesets generated are designed to address a specific intersection of qualities; replica vessels adhere to a tight range of shapes, dimensions, paste recipes, and/or forming techniques. As such, the applicability of those typesets remains narrow and context-specific. How, then, can researchers tackle assemblages with diverse vessel types? Or contexts composed of competing potting traditions? Or contexts with significant proportions of vessels from many different origins? This paper presents a new approach to the way that experimental typesets are designed, developed specifically to address the problem of reliably identifying forming techniques across multiple assemblages. By focusing on accommodating common geometric possibilities of vessel shapes, a generalised typeset can allow individuals to make use of well-documented experimental data. The typeset for the Tracing the Potter’s Wheel project was designed for broad applicability, and has been made freely accessible as a reference collection. Through the creation of and comparison against a generalised typeset, heterogeneous assemblages can be better understood and resources can be directed toward answering specific questions. This paper presents the theoretical foundations supporting the concept of a generalised typeset, as well as the practice of using a generalised typeset for analysis.

Highlights

  • One of the principles which underpins experimental archaeology is the validity of analogy; ensuring that strong analogies are established between experimental variables selected and the archaeological record represented forms the framework against which results are measured

  • Actualistic experiments strongly adhere to conditions which are observed in specific archaeological contexts to address questions which relate directly to those contexts

  • Typeset vessels as individuals may poorly reflect the forms represented in an archaeological assemblage, but features of each experimental form can yet be a strong analogy for understanding the fashioning practices represented across a heterogeneous assemblage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the principles which underpins experimental archaeology is the validity of analogy; ensuring that strong analogies are established between experimental variables selected and the archaeological record represented forms the framework against which results are measured. Omission does have interesting implications, for a far greater number of studies have focused on identifying wheel fashioning methods and techniques without a basis in tailored experimental archaeology (e.g. Choleva, 2013; Choleva, Jung and Kardamaki, 2020; Gorogianni, Abell and Hilditch, 2016; Knappett, 1999; 2005) These studies (whose high quality is not being debated), lacking new experimental archaeology programmes, rely on the experience of the authors for successful identification of relevant evidence of fashioning methods and techniques. Scientistic typesets, might include non-specific raw materials such as commercially-available fine clay, a simple vessel shape such as a cylinder, as well as standardised tools and firing processes This approach effectively disallows the single, strong analogy reached in the case of actualistic typesets, but vessels within the typeset maintain moderate analogy strength in comparisons across a broad swathe of vessel types. The author has undertaken one such intermediate strategy in two separate experiments, by developing a generalised typeset

Background
Method
Accommodating vessel shape
Accommodating different clays
Other variables
Creating the generalised typeset
Using the generalised typeset
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.