Abstract

BackgroundWe determined the generalisability and cost-impact of adopting antibiotic-impregnated CVCs in all paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in England, based on results from a large randomised controlled trial (the CATCH trial; ISRCTN34884569).MethodsBSI rates using standard CVCs were estimated through linkage of national PICU audit data (PICANet) with laboratory surveillance data. We estimated the number of BSI averted if PICUs switched from standard to antibiotic-impregnated CVCs by applying the CATCH trial rate-ratio (0.40; 95% CI 0.17,0.97) to the BSI rate using standard CVCs. The value of healthcare resources made available by averting one BSI as estimated from the trial economic analysis was £10,975; 95% CI -£2,801,£24,751.ResultsThe BSI rate using standard CVCs was 4.58 (95% CI 4.42,4.74) per 1000 CVC-days in 2012. Applying the rate-ratio gave 232 BSI averted using antibiotic CVCs. The additional cost of purchasing antibiotic-impregnated compared with standard CVCs was £36 for each child, corresponding to additional costs of £317,916 for an estimated 8831 CVCs required in PICUs in 2012. Based on 2012 BSI rates, management of BSI in PICUs cost £2.5 million annually (95% uncertainty interval: -£160,986, £5,603,005). The additional cost of antibiotic CVCs would be less than the value of resources associated with managing BSI in PICUs with standard BSI rates >1.2 per 1000 CVC-days.ConclusionsThe cost of introducing antibiotic-impregnated CVCs is less than the cost associated with managing BSIs occurring with standard CVCs. The long-term benefits of preventing BSI could mean that antibiotic CVCs are cost-effective even in PICUs with extremely low BSI rates.

Highlights

  • Bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with serious adverse clinical outcome and increased costs in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs).[1,2,3] Central venous catheters (CVCs) are an important cause of BSI in this population.[4, 5] Results from a large, pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) in PICU showed that CVCs impregnated with antibiotics reduced BSI rates compared with standard CVCs.[6]

  • We estimated the number of BSI averted if PICUs switched from standard to antibiotic-impregnated CVCs by applying the CATCH trial rate-ratio (0.40; 95% CI 0.17,0.97) to the BSI rate using standard CVCs

  • The additional cost of purchasing antibiotic-impregnated compared with standard CVCs was £36 for each child, corresponding to additional costs of £317,916 for an estimated 8831 CVCs required in PICUs in 2012

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with serious adverse clinical outcome and increased costs in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs).[1,2,3] Central venous catheters (CVCs) are an important cause of BSI in this population.[4, 5] Results from a large, pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) in PICU (the CATheter infections in CHildren, CATCH trial; ISRCTN34884569; http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/081347) showed that CVCs impregnated with antibiotics (minocycline and rifampicin) reduced BSI rates compared with standard CVCs.[6] guidelines for adults recommend using antibiotic-impregnated CVCs only for high-risk patients and there are no child-specific guidelines due to lack of RCTs in children until now.[7, 8] Prior to the CATCH trial, standard CVCs were used for the majority of children in UK PICUs.[7]. We determined the generalisability and cost-impact of adopting antibiotic-impregnated CVCs in all paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in England, based on results from a large randomised controlled trial (the CATCH trial; ISRCTN34884569).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call