Abstract

Fracture-related infection (FRI) remains a challenging complication that creates a heavy burden for orthopaedic trauma patients, their families and treating physicians, as well as for healthcare systems. Standardization of the diagnosis of FRI has been poor, which made the undertaking and comparison of studies difficult. Recently, a consensus definition based on diagnostic criteria for FRI was published. As a well-established diagnosis is the first step in the treatment process of FRI, such a definition should not only improve the quality of published reports but also daily clinical practice. The FRI consensus group recently developed guidelines to standardize treatment pathways and outcome measures. At the center of these recommendations was the implementation of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. If such a team is not available, it is recommended to refer complex cases to specialized centers where a MDT is available and physicians are experienced with the treatment of FRI. This should lead to appropriate use of antimicrobials and standardization of surgical strategies. Furthermore, an MDT could play an important role in host optimization. Overall two main surgical concepts are considered, based on the fact that fracture fixation devices primarily target fracture consolidation and can be removed after healing, in contrast to periprosthetic joint infection were the implant is permanent. The first concept consists of implant retention and the second consists of implant removal (healed fracture) or implant exchange (unhealed fracture). In both cases, deep tissue sampling for microbiological examination is mandatory. Key aspects of the surgical management of FRI are a thorough debridement, irrigation with normal saline, fracture stability, dead space management and adequate soft tissue coverage. The use of local antimicrobials needs to be strongly considered. In case of FRI, empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy should be started after tissue sampling. Thereafter, this needs to be adapted according to culture results as soon as possible. Finally, a minimum follow-up of 12 months after cessation of therapy is recommended. Standardized patient outcome measures purely focusing on FRI are currently not available but the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) seems to be the preferred tool to assess the patients’ short and long-term outcome. This review summarizes the current general principles which should be considered during the whole treatment process of patients with FRI based on recommendations from the FRI Consensus Group.Level of evidence: Level V.

Highlights

  • Fracture-related infection (FRI) remains a major complication that can result in permanent functional loss or even amputation in otherwise healthy patients

  • Most treatment principles are currently based on research that has been performed on prosthetic joint infection (PJI)

  • We should aim for standardized recommendations for diagnosis and treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fracture-related infection (FRI) remains a major complication that can result in permanent functional loss or even amputation in otherwise healthy patients. Consistent with this and the concept of antibiotic stewardship programs, a multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of FRI patients should be adopted, in which surgeons are key members of the team, since surgical management plays a critical role Studies within this field are scarce [11, 23, 24]. As the clinical presentation of orthopaedic trauma patients is often extremely variable—ranging from open fractures to chronic/late onset cases— the soft tissue and neurovascular status should be assessed by the treating surgeon, and the overall functionality of the affected limb. Due to the significant decrease in patient burden and equal ability to thoroughly evaluate patients function and changes in function, computer adaptive testing is likely to be common in future outcome assessments, for FRI patients At this time, it appears that NIH PROMIS is the most likely future assessment tool for most orthopaedic trauma research

Conclusion and recommendations
Findings
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call