Abstract

This article explores key questions about targeted versus distributive aid policies within the context of New York's general-purpose state aid program. Development of that program over the past forty years shows ebbs and flows of support for both targeted and distributive approaches. Intense policy debates concerning local fiscal policies occur as part of annual state budget negotiations, although recently, New York policymakers have favored targeted approaches. Yet the traditional measures of targeting governmental needs, such as differences in fiscal capacity and effort, have been expanded to emphasize differences in service responsibilities. Strong, and perhaps ironic, parallels are also evident between New York's program and the now defunct federal revenue sharing program.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.