Abstract
International Journal of Medicine and Public Health,2019,9,3,74-80.DOI:10.5530/ijmedph.2019.3.19Published:November 2019Type:Original ArticleGeneral Procrastination Scale: Development of Validity and ReliabilityPragya Lodha, Ahana Sharma, Gale Dsouza, Ishwari Marathe, Shanaya Dsouza, Shivani Rawal, Vidhi Pandya, and Avinash De Sousa Pragya Lodha1, Ahana Sharma1, Gale Dsouza1, Ishwari Marathe1, Shanaya Dsouza1, Shivani Rawal1, Vidhi Pandya1, Avinash De Sousa2,* 1Clinical Psychologist and Former Post Graduate Student, Maniben Nanavati Women’s College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA. 2Consultant Psychiatrist, Desousa Foundation, Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA. Abstract:Background: Procrastination, generally out, is the practice of carrying out less urgent tasks in preference to more urgent ones, or doing more pleasurable things in place of less pleasurable ones and thus putting off impending tasks to a later time. The primary objective of this paper was to establish preliminary psychometric properties of General Procrastination Scale (GPS)- validity and reliability. The scale. Methods: The final version of GPS was administered on a randomized sample of 140 participants, 69 males and 71 females between the age group of 16 to 27 years. The target population included college students and working younger adults across various regional subdivisions of the metropolitan city of Mumbai. The sample of the test was selected via a Non Probability sampling method of Quota Sampling. Results: The Split Half Reliability was calculated equivalent to 0.711, which was similarly close to the value of Cronabch’s Alpha correlation value, established at 0.714. The General Procrastination Scale was observed to be high on construct validity (0.76) when compared with performance on Lay’s scale of Procrastination. The quartile deviation value was obtained to be 8 and 3 inter quartile ranges were developed for the scale - Q1- 59, Q2- 66 and Q3- 75, where Q2 is equivalent to the median/mean of the scores on the scale. Conclusion: The test is a first of its kind, having been developed and standardized in a relatively collectivist culture and yet in a fairly modernized geographical region, opening grounds for greater research on cross cultural study of procrastination. The scale however has not been standardized on a statistically sufficient large sample of population. Keywords:Procrastination, Reliability, Scale, Validity, YoungView:PDF (322.64 KB)
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Medicine and Public Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
