Abstract

The European Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Insomnia recommends, for all age groups, restrictive, short-term and periodic use of potentially addictive hypnotics. As in other European countries, in Norway, actual practice involving elderly patients differs substantially from this recommendation, as shown by the persistent high frequency of regular prescriptions of addictive hypnotics. To explore experienced Norwegian general practitioners' (GPs') views of the regular prescription of addictive hypnotics to patients older than 70 years living at home. In-depth individual interviews of a purposive sample of experienced specialists in family medicine at GP offices in Southern Norway. Reflexive thematic cross-case analysis. Most of the 11 GPs interviewed had more than 10 elderly patients who were prescribed hypnotics for daily use and the same number for intermittent prescription. Almost all prescriptions were of z-hypnotics. The GPs knew this was contrary to the guideline. Many were at ease with this fact. They emphasised the need to avoid creating new dependencies. The GPs considered these patients a selected minority within this age group with serious sleep problems, for whom few realistic alternatives were available and whose tolerance over time was better than expected. This logic of pragmatic practice reflected a patient-centred approach and respect for the patients' view in a shared decision-making process combined with challenges of limited alternatives and resources. A zero vision on the prescription of addictive hypnotics to the elderly may neither be prudent nor realistic in the context of general practice.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.