Abstract
BackgroundIn most countries with sickness insurance systems, general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the sickness-absence process. Previous studies have indicated that GPs experience several tasks and situations related to sickness certification consultations as problematic. The fact that the organization of primary health care and social insurance systems differ between countries may influence both GPs' experiences and certification. The aim of the present study was to gain more knowledge of GPs' experiences of sickness certification, by comparing data from Sweden and Norway, regarding frequencies and aspects of sickness certification found to be problematic.MethodsStatistical analyses of cross-sectional survey data of sickness certification by GPs in Sweden and Norway. In Sweden, all GPs were included, with 3949 (60.6%) responding. In Norway, a representative sample of GPs was included, with 221 (66.5%) responding.ResultsMost GPs reported having consultations involving sickness certification at least once a week; 95% of the GPs in Sweden and 99% of the GPs in Norway. A majority found such tasks problematic; 60% of the GPs in Sweden and 53% in Norway. In a logistic regression, having a higher frequency of sickness certification consultations was associated with a higher risk of experiencing them as problematic, in both countries. A higher rate of GPs in Sweden than in Norway reported meeting patients wanting a sickness certification without a medical reason. GPs in Sweden found it more problematic to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of sick leave with patients and to issue a prolongation of a sick-leave period initiated by another physician. GPs in Norway more often worried that patients would go to another physician if they did not issue a certificate, and a higher proportion of Norwegian GPs found it problematic to handle situations where they and their patient disagreed on the need for sick leave.ConclusionsThe study confirms that many GPs experience sickness absence consultations as problematic. However, there were differences between the two countries in GPs' experiences, which may be linked to differences in social security regulations and the organization of GP services. Possible causes and consequences of national differences should be addressed in future studies.
Highlights
In most countries with sickness insurance systems, general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the sickness-absence process
Studies from different countries on sickness certification have indicated that physicians, and especially GPs, experience the tasks and situations relating to sickness absence consultations as problematic [1,3,2,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]
A significantly larger proportion of GPs in Norway (75%) reported finding it problematic to handle situations in which they and their patient disagreed on the need for sick leave
Summary
In most countries with sickness insurance systems, general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the sickness-absence process. Studies from different countries on sickness certification have indicated that physicians, and especially GPs, experience the tasks and situations relating to sickness absence consultations as problematic [1,3,2,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. In relation to sickness certification, many physicians find it problematic to handle the two roles as the treating physician and as the medical expert to the social insurance services [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] Physicians find it problematic handling situations where they and the patient disagree on the need for sick leave [4,10,11,14,15,16,17]. Our knowledge of GPs’ sickness certification practices remains limited [2]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
