Abstract
ABSTRACT A simulation study was conducted to explore robustness of general factor mean difference estimation in bifactor measurement models with ordered-categorical measures. Common analysis misspecifications in which generated bifactor data were fitted using a unidimensional model and/or ordered-categorical data were treated as continuous were compared under generation conditions varying by sample size, number of response categories, effect size of the general factor mean difference, and loadings on the specific factors. Fitting bifactor data using unidimensional models resulted in estimation bias in the general factor mean difference, with magnitude largely determined by degree of unidimensionality and size of the general factor mean difference. Although bifactor models produced less estimation bias, estimates were less precise. Modeling the data as categorical and employing the WLSMV estimator provided somewhat more power, whereas modeling the data as continuous and applying MLR produced relatively less estimation bias when unidimensional models were specified for strongly bifactor data.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
