Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: Blood-based specimens may be a potential source of non-invasive DNA methylation cancer biomarkers. Peripheral blood leukocytes from patients with solid tumors exhibit complex and distinct cancer-associated DNA methylation patterns, which might be seen as epigenetic biomarkers with significant clinical potential. However, peripheral blood cell methylation profiles are largely unknown in hematopoietic cancers. Our aim was to compare DNA methylation status in bone marrow (BM) aspirate and peripheral blood (PB) of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients at diagnosis. Methods: We compare DNA methylation status of the tumor suppressor genes, p15, p16, p53, DAPK and MGMT, and of TRAIL (TNF-Related Apoptotic Inducing Ligand) receptor genes, TRAIL-DcR1, -DcR2, -DR4 and -DR5), in 45 Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients at diagnosis, in genomic DNA obtained from BM aspirate and PB samples, after informed consent. Genomic DNA was isolated by standard protocols and modified by sodium bissulphite. The MS-PCR for each gene was performed using two sets of primers, one for methylated DNA and other for unmethylated DNA. k2 Test was used to analyses association between groups and Kappa statistics to evaluate concordance, results were considered statistically significant when p Results: We observed a good concordant results between BM and PB samples in 77,8% of patients for p16 (p = 0,017), 75,6% for p15 (p = 0,028), 62,2% for DAPK (p = 0,031), 84,4% for TRAIL-DcR1, 68,9% for TRAIL-DcR2, 66,7% for TRAIL-DR4 and a discordant results for TRAIL-DR5 gene (p = 0,012), since only 37,8% of the tested samples were concordant. In some cases discrepancies were also bidirectional, with cases presenting demethylated PB and methylated BM aspirate and vice versa. No patient presented p53 and MGMT gene methylated. Conclusions: Our results show a correlation between gene methylation patterns in PB and BM aspirate in MDS patients. Although DNA methylation patterns measured in PB may have great potential as informative biomarkers of cancer risk and prognosis, large systematic and prospective studies will be needed. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.