Abstract

Extensive genetic studies have identified a large number of causal genetic variations in many human phenotypes; however, these could not completely explain heritability in complex diseases. Some researchers have proposed that the “missing heritability” may be attributable to gene–gene and gene–environment interactions. Because there are billions of potential interaction combinations, the statistical power of a single study is often ineffective in detecting these interactions. Meta-analysis is a common method of increasing detection power; however, accessing individual data could be difficult. This study presents a simple method that employs aggregated summary values from a “case” group to detect these specific interactions that based on rare disease and independence assumptions. However, these assumptions, particularly the rare disease assumption, may be violated in real situations; therefore, this study further investigated the robustness of our proposed method when it violates the assumptions. In conclusion, we observed that the rare disease assumption is relatively nonessential, whereas the independence assumption is an essential component. Because single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are often unrelated to environmental factors and SNPs on other chromosomes, researchers should use this method to investigate gene–gene and gene–environment interactions when they are unable to obtain detailed individual patient data.

Highlights

  • Extensive genetic studies have identified a large number of causal genetic variations in many phenotypes; these could not completely explain the phenomenon of heritability in complex phenotypes [1]

  • It was difficult for researchers to obtain the population aggregated summary values of case-control studies; they often could only access the aggregated summary values in “cases” and “controls.” most genetic association studies are designed as case-control investigations

  • This work is trying to propose a new method for meta-analysis when researchers were unable to obtain the raw data of each individual sample. It is difficult for accessing the detailed individual data [5,6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extensive genetic studies have identified a large number of causal genetic variations in many phenotypes; these could not completely explain the phenomenon of heritability in complex phenotypes [1]. Meta-analysis using individual patient data is considered the gold standard for investigating the moderator effect of participant-type variables [5,6]; access to detailed individual data could often be difficult. Meta-analyses using aggregate data have been more frequently employed because it maximizes the number of studies, patients, and events [7,8]. These methods are relatively difficult to apply in the meta-analysis of genetic association studies. A method for detecting gene–gene and gene–environment interactions in a meta-analysis of a case-control study was imperative

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call