Abstract

Research across groups and methods consistently finds a gender difference in patterns of specificity of genital response; however, empirically supported mechanisms to explain this difference are lacking. The information-processing model of sexual arousal posits that automatic and controlled cognitive processes are requisite for the generation of sexual responses. Androphilic women’s gender-nonspecific response patterns may be the result of sexually-relevant cues that are common to both preferred and nonpreferred genders capturing attention and initiating an automatic sexual response, whereas men’s attentional system may be biased towards the detection and response to sexually-preferred cues only. In the present study, we used eye tracking to assess visual attention to sexually-preferred and nonpreferred cues in a sample of androphilic women and gynephilic men. Results support predictions from the information-processing model regarding gendered processing of sexual stimuli in men and women. Men’s initial attention patterns were gender-specific, whereas women’s were nonspecific. In contrast, both men and women exhibited gender-specific patterns of controlled attention, although this effect was stronger among men. Finally, measures of attention and self-reported attraction were positively related in both men and women. These findings are discussed in the context of the information-processing model and evolutionary mechanisms that may have evolved to promote gendered attentional systems.

Highlights

  • Sexual response is an emotional state emerging from interactions among physiological responses, cognitive processing of sexual cues, and affective responses [1, 2]

  • Given the results of Chivers, Bouchard, and Timmers [52] regarding patterns of genital response in exclusive versus predominantly androphilic women, we examined our data to see what effect the exclusivity of sexual attraction had on the gender difference in specificity of visual attention

  • Based on predictions generated from the information-processing model (IPM) with respect to attentional biases towards sexually-preferred and nonpreferred sexual targets, as well as gender differences in the specificity of genital and self-reported sexual arousal (e.g., [4, 5]), we expected to find a gender difference in patterns of visual attention

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sexual response is an emotional state emerging from interactions among physiological responses (e.g., genital vasocongestion), cognitive processing of sexual cues (e.g., attention), and affective responses [1, 2]. Gender differences in the stimulus cues that elicit sexual response are well established. Men’s genital and self-reported sexual responses are category-specific, readily distinguishing between preferred and nonpreferred sexual stimuli, thereby exhibiting a bias towards cues or features that correspond with their stated sexual attractions [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Androphilic (i.e., sexually attracted to men) women’s genital response patterns, and PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0152785. Gender-Specificity of Visual Attention in Women and Men Androphilic (i.e., sexually attracted to men) women’s genital response patterns, and PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0152785 April 18, 2016

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call