Abstract

This paper explores in parallel the underlying mechanisms in human perception of biological motion and the best approaches for automatic classification of gait. The experiments tested three different learning paradigms, namely, biological, biomimetic, and non-biomimetic models for gender identification from human gait. Psychophysical experiments with twenty-one observers were conducted along with computational experiments without applying any gender specific modifications to the models or the stimuli. Results demonstrate the utilization of a generic memory based learning system in humans for gait perception, thus reducing ambiguity between two opposing learning systems proposed for biological motion perception. Results also support the biomimetic nature of memory based artificial neural networks (ANN) in their ability to emulate biological neural networks, as opposed to non-biomimetic models. In addition, the comparison between biological and computational learning approaches establishes a memory based biomimetic model as the best candidate for a generic artificial gait classifier (83% accuracy, p < 0.001), compared to human observers (66%, p < 0.005) or non-biomimetic models (83%, p < 0.001) while adhering to human-like sensitivity to gender identification, promising potential for application of the model in any given non-gender based gait perception objective with superhuman performance.

Highlights

  • A person’s gait carries information about the individual along multiple dimensions

  • Recognition of biological motion could be attributed to generic learning systems that are trained with experience

  • The behavior goes against the expected biological behavior and the results demonstrated by the Long Short Term Memory (LSTM), denoting a loss of performance in a form of data which is biologically more conducive to gender identification

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A person’s gait carries information about the individual along multiple dimensions. In addition to indicating biologically intrinsic properties, like gender and identity, the gait of a person changes dynamically based on their emotional state (Pollick et al, 2002) and state of health (Cesari et al, 2005). Humans are adept at identifying whether a given sparse motion pattern is biological or not (Johansson, 1973, 1976) as well as detecting properties such as gender or mood. The ability to distinguish biological from non-biological motion appears at a very young age (Fox and McDaniel, 1982), suggesting there may be some expert-system capacities present at birth. Some theorists have suggested that biological motion perception served as an evolutionary and developmental precursors to the theory of the mind (Frith, 1999). Recognition of biological motion could be attributed to generic learning systems that are trained with experience

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call