Abstract

Our study analyses the determinants of the gender gap in academic entrepreneurship among UK-based academics from across a wide range of academic disciplines. We focus on spinout activity as a measure of academic entrepreneurship, and explore the relevance of the different explanations for the gender gap. Our analysis is based on a unique survey of UK academics conducted in 2008/2009. The survey provides micro-data on over 22,000 academics in the sciences, social sciences, arts and humanities, across all higher education institutions in the UK. Our results show that female academics differ from the male academics in the sample in important ways. Female academics are more likely to be involved in applied research, to hold more junior positions, to work in the health sciences, social sciences, humanities and education, to have less prior experience of running a business, and to feel more ambivalent about research commercialisation. All of these characteristics are correlated with lower rates of spinout activity. Using a non-parametric decomposition analysis, we show that certain combinations of characteristics of male academics have few or no matches to female academics, and these characteristics explain a large proportion of the gender gap.

Highlights

  • Academic entrepreneurship, defined as the commercial application of academic research, is an increasingly important aspect of academic life

  • Our study analyses the determinants of the gender gap in academic entrepreneurship among UK-based academics from across a wide range of academic disciplines

  • We focus on spinout activity as a measure of academic entrepreneurship, and explore the relevance of the different explanations for the gender gap

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Academic entrepreneurship, defined as the commercial application of academic research, is an increasingly important aspect of academic life. Female academics are less likely to disclose their inventions (Thursby and Thursby 2005), hold a patent (Whittington and Smith-Doerr 2005; Ding et al 2006) or create a new enterprise based on their research (Rosa and Dawson 2006). This is surprising given that the gender gap in other measures of academic productivity, such as publishing, is closing (Xie and Shauman 2003). Colyvas et al (2012) find that once a range of personal and institutional characteristics are accounted for, there is no further gender gap in the likelihood of disclosure of inventions, or in the likelihood that disclosures are converted into licenses

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.