Gender has to be taken into account in diagnosing adult growth hormone deficiency by the GHRH plus arginine test

Abstract

ObjectiveData on the effect of gender on the interpretation of the GHRH plus arginine stimulation test (GHRH+ARG test) is controversial. We validated the GHRH+ARG stimulation test in control subjects and patients with organic or idiopathic pituitary disease and a suspicion of adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) using the Immulite 2000 XPi GH assay. DesignWe studied 126 apparently healthy adults (median age 38.8years) and 34 patients with a suspicion of AGHD (median age 42.2years). Identification of AGHD with the GHRH+ARG test was investigated with commonly accepted BMI-related consensus cut-off limits for peak GH concentrations. Serum samples collected during the GHRH+ARG test were analysed for GH in 2014–2015. Serum IGF-1 concentrations were studied as a reference. ResultsIn 14 of 65 (22%) control males the GH peak value was below the BMI-related cut-off limits for GH sufficiency indicating a false diagnosis of AGHD. All control females had a normal GHRH+ARG response. Median peak GH response was significantly (p<0.001) higher in female (39.3μg/L) than in male controls (21μg/L). According to consensus cut-offs all but one young female patient had a deficient response compatible with a diagnosis of AGHD. ConclusionsThe GH response to stimulation by GHRH+ARG is gender-dependent, being lower in healthy males than in females. Gender should be considered when defining cut-off limits for peak GH concentrations in the GHRH+ARG test. The presently used BMI-related cut-off levels will lead to a significant misclassification of males as GH deficient.