Abstract

Galak and Kahn (Marketing Letters, 2021) report that females and underrepresented minorities face a less favorable organizational climate within academic marketing as compared to their respective counterparts. We complement this perspective by assessing the extent to which a gender gap is detectable in academic journal publications in marketing. To this end, we collect a data set which covers all publications of a broad range of peer-reviewed academic journals in business, including marketing, across two decades. We then develop an algorithm that allows us to determine the authors’ gender. We use these data to study a potential gender gap in academic marketing journals. Results indicate that a gender gap in academic publishing in marketing is present and substantial, although it has been declining over time. At the same time, it continues to be particularly visible in the most prestigious journals. While marketing is still far from being a role model, the gender gap is smaller in marketing compared to other fields in business. Our analysis complements the findings by Galak and Kahn (Marketing Letters, 2021) by showing that female scholars do not only experience an unfavorable organizational climate, but they are also underrepresented in academic marketing journals.

Highlights

  • Galak and Kahn (2021) report and discuss the results of the 2019 Academic Marketing Climate Survey

  • A key conclusion from their survey is that women view the organizational climate less favorable compared to men

  • Is a gender gap present if the share of female authorships is below the share of female marketing faculty? It is probably not realistic to expect that women account for 50% of publications if they constitute substantially less than half of marketing faculty

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Galak and Kahn (2021) report and discuss the results of the 2019 Academic Marketing Climate Survey. In their study, Galak and Kahn (2021) focus on organizational climate, and their survey contained only one question that referred to unfair treatment in publishing decisions The answers to this question reveal little difference between women and men, in particular if compared to the substantial differences in response to other questions (e.g., teaching, invitations to participate in research conferences, service obligations, or compensation). Given that it was beyond the scope of Galak and Kahn’s survey to analyze the perceptions or experiences that scholars face in the domain of academic publishing in detail, we believe it is important to complement their analysis in this respect. We will focus our analysis on author names that were either classified as male or as female

Analysis
What is the share of female authorships in academic marketing journals?
How has this share developed in the last two decades?
What is the share of female scholars in editorial review boards?
Findings
Discussion and conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call