Gender Distribution of Deans Among US Medical Schools: Towards Equity in Academic Medicine

Abstract

Less than half of medical school professorships and decanal ranks are held by women. Our study investigates the gender-based geographical distribution and differences in lifetime peer-reviewed publications, H-index, and grant funding by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of all allopathic medical school deans in the United States (US). A cross-sectional cohort study utilizing data from US allopathic medical school websites, PubMed, and the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools regarding lifetime peer-reviewed publications and quantity/monetary sum of NIH grants received by medical school deans. Descriptive statistics, independent sample T-tests, and ANOVA were performed with statistical significance defined as P < 0.05. Women occupied 33/157 (21.0%) dean positions overall. Compared to women, men possess higher mean number of lifetime peer-reviewed publications (112.0vs. 55.2, P=0.001) and H-index (43.2vs. 25.7, P=0.001); however, there are no differences in the mean number of NIH grants (27.5vs. 19.1, P=0.323) nor mean total NIH funding received ($18,931,336vs. $14,289,529, P=0.524). While significant differences in mean H-index between all US regions were found (P=0.002), no significant differences exist between major US regions regarding the mean lifetime publication count (P=0.223), NIH grants received (P=0.200), nor total NIH funding (P=0.824) received. A significant discrepancy in the gender distribution, lifetime peer-reviewed publications, and H-index of allopathic medical school deans exists across the US, highlighting the need for adequate support for women in academic medicine. Greater implementation of mentorship, increased institutional support, and diversity training can improve the representation of women in medical school decanal positions.