Gender distribution in asymptomatic and invasive amebiasis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The majority of individuals infected by the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica experience subclinical infections. However, a small proportion of parasitized individuals develop severe invasive disease such as amebic dysentery or amebic liver abscess. Invasive amebiasis affects predominantly men; the usual explanation for this has been that men have a higher rate of asymptomatic infections and therefore experience a higher rate of invasive disease. To date, there is no convincing evidence of an increased rate of asymptomatic infection of men as compared with women. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evidence supporting the hypothesis that men have higher rates of asymptomatic infection and thus an increased frequency of invasive amebiasis. METHODS: We reviewed published reports of invasive amebiasis and population-based parasitological studies from 1929–1997 to compare the gender ratio of asymptomatic and symptomatic E. histolytica infection. Infections with E. histolytica were differentiated from the nonpathogenic E. dispar whenever possible. RESULTS: The reports of invasive amebiasis (dysentery, liver abscess, colonic perforation, peritonitis, appendicitis, and ameboma) showed a higher proportion of men than women (ratio, male:female = 3.2:1, p < 0.05). This contrasts with the epidemiological surveys, where the rate of asymptomatic infection with E. histolytica was the same (1:1) for both genders ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic E. histolytica infection is equally distributed between the genders. The high proportion of men with invasive amebiasis may be due to a male-related susceptibility to invasive disease.