Abstract
The paper assesses gender disparities in Urban and Regional Planning (URP) education in Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (LAUTECH) and Federal University of Technology, Akure (FUTA). Simple random sampling method was employed to administer 225 questionnaires in both institutions. Secondary data on student’s enrolment between 2003 and 2013 was obtained from the departments of Urban and Regional Planning of both institutions. ‘Factors of Gender Disparity Index’ (FGDI) was developed to measure factors responsible for gender disparities in planning education in the two institutions. Findings revealed that the ratio of male to female in all the academic sessions investigated varies in the selected institutions. In FUTA it was observed that the highest ratio of male: female is 4:1 while the lowest ratio is 5:2. However, in LAUTECH, the highest ‘gender disparity range’ is 7: 4 while the lowest is 3:2. The factor with the highest FGDI in LAUTECH is ‘course is preferably taken by male’ (3.19) while in FUTA, ‘male can handle pressure situations better than female’ (3.1). Other factors of significant FGDI are: ‘very low interest in the course on the part of female students’, and ‘the stress undergone during the process of the course’. The study recommends increasing awareness on the prospects and professional benefits of Urban and Regional Planning (TOPREC) education through the Town Planners’ Registration Council. Policies on tertiary education programme should deal with gender-stereotyped and bias courses. Keywords: gender, disparity, URP, DOI : 10.7176/DCS/9-9-04 Publication date :September 30 th 2019
Highlights
Natural and human resources are common endowment of all nations of the world but the distribution varies
Developing countries like Liberia was estimated as 328,300 compared to Nigeria population estimated as 140, 431,790 in 2006 (NPC, 2006).This disparity is not limited to population size; it is reflected in gender distribution
This inequality attracted the attention of international communities and several campaigns at conferences and workshops have been held for more equitable distribution of the world resources between men and women (Onsongo, 2006)
Summary
Natural and human resources are common endowment of all nations of the world but the distribution varies. Developing countries like Liberia was estimated as 328,300 compared to Nigeria population estimated as 140, 431,790 in 2006 (NPC, 2006).This disparity is not limited to population size; it is reflected in gender distribution This inequality attracted the attention of international communities and several campaigns at conferences and workshops have been held for more equitable distribution of the world resources between men and women (Onsongo, 2006). Proportion of male inhabitants was recorded as against the number (69,086,302) recorded for female (NPC, 2010) Against this shortfall, and coupled with the fact that the disparity is not limited to population but there are other several implications especially on distribution of social amenities as well as access to education. Access to education has been a major challenge in developing and under developed nations This was reported by UNESCO (2012) that girls and women remained deprived of full and equal opportunities for education.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
