Abstract

The present study investigated whether there are gender differences in how perceived use of relationship maintenance strategies by a partner is linked to subject’s relationship satisfaction in a Lithuanian sample. The sample consisted of 472 participants in committed romantic relationship, including 389 women and 83 men with a mean age of 21.89 years. The sample included 232 participants in dating relationship, 216 cohabiting and 24 married. Mean relationship duration was 31.91 months. Stafford’s (2011) Relationship Maintenance Behaviors Measure was used to assess relationship maintenance, while relationship satisfaction was measured by Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-32) of Funk and Rogge (2007). Results of the study indicated that women perceived their partners using more positivity, understanding, assurances, sharing tasks, and social network strategies than men did. While no statistically significant gender differences in relationship satisfaction were found, all relationship maintenance strategies were positively correlated with relationship satisfaction for both men and women. However, strategies contributing towards prediction of relationship satisfaction differed for men and women. For women, relationship satisfaction was best predicted by perceived assurances, followed by understanding, positivity, and self-disclosure, which collectively accounted for just under 40% of variance in relationship satisfaction. For men, only perceived partner’s positivity was significant predictor of relationship satisfaction, but it alone accounted for 51.6 percent of variance in relationship satisfaction. Neither relationship status nor relationship duration were significant in predicting relationship satisfaction of either men or women.

Highlights

  • The present study investigated whether there are gender differences in how perceived use of relationship maintenance strategies by a partner is linked to subject’s relationship satisfaction in a Lithuanian sample

  • Gender Differences In Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Relationship Satisfaction It is well established that involvement in committed romantic relationship strongly contributes towards personal well-being

  • While recent research suggests that there are no gender differences in GENDER DIFFERENCES IN RELATIONSHIP MAINTENANCE BEHAVIORS AND RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION Visvaldas Legkauskas, Gintarė Pazniokaitė levels of relationship satisfaction experienced by men and women (Jackson, Miller, Oka, & Henry, 2014), factors contributing towards their relationship satisfaction differ (De Andrade, Wachelke, & Howat-Rodrigues, 2015; Le, Dove, Agnew, Korn, & Mutso, 2010; Ogolsky & Bowers, 2012)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present study investigated whether there are gender differences in how perceived use of relationship maintenance strategies by a partner is linked to subject’s relationship satisfaction in a Lithuanian sample. These behaviors are among those factors, which have been significantly and consistently linked to relationship satisfaction by previous research (Ballard-Reisch, Weigel, & Zaguidoulline, 1999; Dainton & Stafford, 1993; Stafford, 2011; Stafford & Canary, 1991; Weigel & Ballard-Reisch, 2008) Most research in this field was conducted using the initial model of Stafford and Canary (1991), which conceptualized 5 relationship maintenance strategies – positivity, openness, assurances, social network, and sharing tasks. In meta-analysis of some 35 studies on correlates of relationship maintenance strategies, Ogolsky and Bowers (2012) found that while men and women did not differ in their perception of partner’s use of openness, women perceived their partners as engaged in more positivity, assurances, social networks and sharing tasks. Cumulative evidence from earlier studies seem to indicate that perceived use of positivity and assurances by partners is important in predicting relationship satisfaction of both men and women, while predictive utility of openness seems to be the lowest (Ballard-Reisch et al, 1999; Dainton, 2000; Dainton, Stafford, & Canary, 1994; Weigel & Ballard-Reisch, 2001; Weigel & Ballard-Reisch, 2008)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call