Abstract

Among the most cited series of experiments in social and evolutionary psychology are those conducted by Clark and Hatfield (1989, 2003). In these studies, college students served as confederates in a simple field experiment. They approached fellow college students of another gender and asked one of three questions: (a) “Would you go out with me tonight?” (b) “Would you come over to my apartment tonight?” or (c) “Would you go to bed with me tonight?” Men and women differed markedly in their receptivity to casual sexual offers. When asked: “Would you go out with me tonight?” both were equally receptive. Yet, when confederates asked, “Would you come over to my apartment” or “Would you go to bed with me?” gender differences were striking. In the following series of experiments we attempted to develop a pencil and paper method to mirror the procedure of the classic study. We think we succeeded. Although cultural and social considerations may have influenced participants’ tendency to accept or reject sexual offers, as predicted by evolutionary perspectives, in all three experiments men were more likely than women to accept sexual offers. The studies also explored some of the reasons men and women gave for refusing a date, apartment visit, or a sexual encounter. We close by itemizing some questions that, given this new set of research materials, may be worth asking.

Highlights

  • Among the most cited series of experiments in social and evolutionary psychology are those conducted by Clark and Hatfield (1989, 2003)

  • In these experiments, conducted to test the classic evolutionary theory notion that men are generally more receptive to sexual offers than are women (Symons, 1979; Trivers, 1972), college students approached fellow students and asked one of three questions: (a) “Would you go out with me tonight?” (b) “Would you come over to my apartment tonight?” or (c) “Would you go to bed with me tonight?” Men and women differed markedly in their receptivity to casual sexual offers

  • This could be the result of a number of different possibilities: 1. Perhaps Hawai‘i, which is a predominately an Asian-American, multicultural society, is more conservative than were the Florida students who participated in the classic study so many years ago (Forbes, 2012; Woo, Brotto, & Gorzalka, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Among the most cited series of experiments in social and evolutionary psychology are those conducted by Clark and Hatfield (1989, 2003). One of the most cited series of experiments in social and evolutionary psychology are those conducted by Clark and Hatfield (1989, 2003) and Clark (1990) In these experiments, conducted to test the classic evolutionary theory notion that men are generally more receptive to sexual offers than are women (Symons, 1979; Trivers, 1972), college students approached fellow students and asked one of three questions: (a) “Would you go out with me tonight?” (b) “Would you come over to my apartment tonight?” or (c) “Would you go to bed with me tonight?” Men and women differed markedly in their receptivity to casual sexual offers (see Table 1). Among these Neo-Darwinian understandings are: intrasexual and intersexual selection, good genes sexual selection (Møller & Alatalo, 1999), Fisher’s (1915) conceptualism of runaway sexual selection (see Pomiankowski, Iwasa, & Nee, 1991), Zahavi and Zahavi’s (1997) handicap principle, the immunocompetence handicap principle, sexual antagonistic co-evolution, and the life history theory (Kokko, Brooks, McNamara, & Houston, 2002), among others

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call