Abstract

The research aimed at the exploration of gender differences in the quality of close relationships with a mother, a father, a sibling, a partner, and a friend concerning the negative exchange in the form of conflicts and antagonism, as well as the role of personality traits and communication styles in the development of individual differences. The sample consisted of 400 participants (69% females), age from 19 to 51. Data were collected using the short version of personality questionnaire Big Five Plus Two (VP+2-70), questionnaire about close relationship quality Network of Relationship Inventory (NRI), and the scale for estimating communication skills, Communicator Style Measure (CSM). The results confirmed gender specificities concerning a degree of the negative exchange in the relationship types, and their correlations with personality traits and communication style. Females had stronger negative exchange with partners and fathers, while males had it with siblings. Extraverted females had more conflicts with their mothers. Higher Openness and Positive Valence of males was followed by greater conflicts with partner and lower Antagonism with friends, whereas the higher Consciousness was followed by greater negative exchange with siblings. Daughters with more assertive communication and sons with more expressive communication had stronger degree of confrontations with parents. On the other hand, males with more assertive communication, and females with more expressive communication had stronger conflicts with partners. Stronger negative exchange of females with fathers and partners was probably due to their greater orientation to deal with relationship problems and emancipation needs. The result that more assertive women had stronger degree of conflict with parents maybe the results from the fostering of the honest communication in the family of origin. Confronting more assertive women with their parents may stem from fostering honest and directive communication in the family of origin. Given that the society pressures males to be independent, the result that more expressive males had stronger negative exchange with their family of origin had been expected. These findings showed that expressiveness indicate immaturity. The willingness of more assertive men to engage in a negative exchange with a partner indicates their involvement in the relationship.

Highlights

  • Close interpersonal relationships determine psycho-social development of every individual

  • The aim of the research was to determine the existence of gender differences in expressing the dimensions of quality of close relationships, negative exchanges, with their relatives, as well as to determine the role of personality traits and communication styles as possible determinants of these differences

  • In the domain of negative exchange, substantially positively asymmetric distributions were observed for the scores on Conflict and Antagonism with a mother, a father, a sibling and a friend, while significant negatively asymmetric distributions were observed only for Conflict with a partner in both genders

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Close interpersonal relationships determine psycho-social development of every individual. They are recognized as socialization agents and providers of the context for the early childhood development. The accumulation of knowledge has showed that quality includes other positive aspects of the relationship experiences like interaction, intimacy, respect and affection, as well as negative ones like conflicts, antagonisms, criticism, rejection, and violence (Furman & Buhrmester, 1985, 2009; Vangelisti, 2006). Dysfunctional events in relationships cannot be avoided (Cupach & Spitzberg, 1998), but can be used as an alarm for the change. They are the main challenge to intimacy because they can lead to a decline in the quality of the relationship and its termination. “Among the most commonly studied negative phenomena there are abuse and sexual violence, communicational and interactive problems (i.e. conflicts), the beginning and termination of relationships (i.e. jealousy), and problematic relationships” (Perlman & Carcedo, 2011, pp. 5-6)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call