Abstract

Debates over possible gender differences in moral development have not considered the maturational issue that, during early adolescence, girls are generally about two years ahead of boys in cerebral cortical and social-cognitive functioning. To support Gilligan’s thesis that Kohlberg’s model is biased toward males, less mature boys would need only to score as well in level of moral development as more mature girls. In this study, which included 190 early adolescent boys and girls, the mean level of moral development among girls was significantly higher than among boys. Analyses indicated that this pattern was maintained even after taking into consideration parents’ moral stage, social class, ethnicity, and other background differences. Findings are consistent with the thesis that there are no inherent sex differences in moral reasoning development.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call