Abstract

Numerous studies have revealed the key role of social pressure on individuals’ decision-making processes. However, the impact of social pressure on unfairness-related decision-making processes remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated how social pressure modulated men’s and women’s responses in an ultimatum game. Twenty women and eighteen men played the ultimatum game as responders in the scanner, where fair and unfair offers were tendered by proposers acting alone (low pressure) or by proposers endorsed by three supporters (high pressure). Results showed that men rejected more, whereas women accepted more unfair offers in the high versus low pressure context. Neurally, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex activation in women positively predicted their acceptance rate difference between contexts. In men, stronger right anterior insula activation and increased connectivity between right anterior insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex were observed when they receiving unfair offers in the high than low pressure context. Furthermore, more bilateral anterior insula and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activations were found when men rejected (relative to accepted) unfair offers in the high than low pressure context. These findings highlighted gender differences in the modulation of behavioral and neural responses to unfairness by social pressure.

Highlights

  • Fairness emerges as a key concept in social interactions and affects human behavior dramatically

  • These evidence consistently suggested the involvements of anterior insula (AI) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) in responding to signals associated with norm violations

  • The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was found to be related to rejection of unfair offers in Ultimatum Game (UG) and its activation was thought to be associated with overriding self-interested impulses[1,13,14,29,30]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fairness emerges as a key concept in social interactions and affects human behavior dramatically. AI and dACC were found to display a similar activation pattern, that is, they were more active in rejection of unfair offers when the proposer had no-alternative as well as acceptance of offers when the proposer had a fair- or hyperfair-alternative, indicating the role of both regions in detecting personal norm-violations. Taken together, these evidence consistently suggested the involvements of AI and dACC in responding to signals associated with norm violations. We expected the involvements of unfairness-related brain regions, such as AI, dACC and DLPFC in the modulation of social pressure on women and men responders’ reactions to unfair offers

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call