Abstract

AbstractThe existing evidence suggests that there is a reverse gender gap in higher education in Mongolia. Prior studies on the reverse gender gap in education were based on the gross enrolment rates and did not delve deeper in terms of using empirical data analyzed over an extended time-period. This paper investigates gender bias in the households’ expenditure on higher education and tracks changes over the ten-year period from 2008 to 2018 using empirical data. In this regard, this study examines the factors and determinants responsible for the gender bias in the households’ expenditure on higher education. To address these questions, the study employs the Engel Curve approach (unconditional educational expenditure) and Hurdle model, which estimates bias in the enrolment decisions and bias in the conditional educational expenditure, both at the household and individual level in 2008 and 2018, using the Household Socio-Economic Survey of Mongolia. Its findings illustrate that gender bias in households’ expenditure on higher education does exist, and it favors girls over boys at the household and individual levels in 2008 and 2018. The findings show that households allocate a greater share of education expenditure to females aged 16–18 and 19–24 than to their male counterparts. Statistical analysis suggests that households’ residence and the occupation of household heads are two important factors affecting this gender bias. Thus, if a household resides in the countryside and its head is employed in the agricultural sector, female offspring are more likely to receive higher education than male offspring. Traditional gender roles and the Mongolian way of life, which centers around attending to livestock and requiring a male labor force and the wage gap, are contextual factors that help explain this gender bias.

Highlights

  • Intra-household gender bias exists in different forms regarding the household decision-making process, asset ownership, allocation of food, health, education expenditure, etc

  • According to the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, trends in gender inequality in higher education is defined as “examining the changes in the composition of the student population in higher education, the relative share of degrees awarded to women each year, the levels of education attained by men and women and lastly, the differences between the subjects studied by men and women” (Lancrin 2008)

  • To understand the Mongolian context, it is important to discuss the education system in Mongolia. This will allow for showcasing how the education system works in the country, how it shows its neutrality in terms of being universal, and how it does not favor the enrolment of any particular gender, eliminating any notions that gender bias is a structural issue that stems from the education system

Read more

Summary

11.1 Introduction

Intra-household gender bias exists in different forms regarding the household decision-making process, asset ownership, allocation of food, health, education expenditure, etc. Education plays an important role in any country’s economic and sustainable development, the gender imbalance of all types of educational levels is becoming a phenomenon in many countries This applies to Mongolia, in terms of the higher composition of female students in higher education. Pastore (2008) studies the returns to education of young people in Mongolia using the School to Work Transition Survey in Mongolia which is carried out in 2016 He found that there is a sizeable gender pay gap in which the median wage of women is about 25% lower than men with the same characteristics. Identifying gender differences in the allocation of households for investment in higher education in Mongolia is important to understand what policy measures should be taken to reduce gender inequality in the country. Are there gender differences in the allocation of higher education expenditures within Mongolian households? What factors explain households’ educational expenditure and gender difference?

11.2 Background on Mongolia’s Educational Policy
11.4 The Household-Level
11.5 Gender Bias and Individuality
Findings
11.6 Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call