Gender and Racial Diversity among U.S. Urology Residency Programs and Efforts to Improve It: You Can't Be What You Can't See.

Abstract

The U.S. urology workforce lacks ethnic and gender diversity. Few programs exist to increase diversity, and little is known on their effectiveness. We assessed the landscape of specific programs designed to increase underrepresented in medicine (URiM) and female student participation in the U.S. Urology Match, and understand the concerns and attitudes of those students. To better understand urology-specific programs, we sent an 11-item survey to all 143 urology residency programs. To better understand the concerns and attitudes of URiM and female students participating in the U.S. Urology Match, we sent a 12-item survey to the students who participated in the Match from 2017 to 2021. Lastly, we evaluated trends in match rate using Match data from 2019 to 2021. Among programs, 43% responded to our survey. Most residency programs offer a wide array of initiatives to increase their diversity, with unconscious bias training being the most frequent (78.7%). Programs with at least 1 female faculty member were associated with increased recruitment of female residents over time (p=0.047). A similar trend was seen in programs with URiM faculty. Among students, 10.5% responded to our survey, of whom 79.2% were unaware of any programs at their institution geared toward URiM or female students. Match data revealed that women were more likely to match (p=0.002), and URiM students were less likely to match (p <0.001) compared to the overall Match rate. Urology programs are making substantial efforts to improve diversity, but the message is lacking reach. Having a diverse faculty did make a difference in programs' ability to diversify.