Abstract

This quantitative study analysed gender, age and faculty differences in the learn- ing practices and other pertinent factors as perceived by the undergraduate students at the National University of Lesotho (NUL). The quota sampling method was used to select 312 students (n = 312) from the seven faculties. Adopting the constructivism theory of learning, a validated and reliable questionnaire was constructed for data collection through a survey. The questionnaire had thirty seven items on the four categories of learning practices: classroom practices, studying practices, assessment practices and academic integrity practices. Fifteen items focused on the pertinent personal factors and the institutional factors. All the items were measured on a five point Likert’s Scale. Data was analysed through statistical tools of Independent t-test and Analysis of Variance. Students perceived all the four learning practices above the mean level. Classroom practices and studying practices were perceived to be the highest and lowest learning practices, respectively. Academic integrity practice had a gender difference in students’ perception while age difference was determined in studying practices. Neither age nor gender difference was determined in students’ perception towards either the personal or the institutional factors pertinent to learning. Students perceived three learning practices differently: assessment practices, studying practices and academic integrity practices. Studying practices and assessment practices were perceived the lowest by students in Science and Technology Faculty while academic integrity practices were at the lowest in the health sciences faculty. The study recommends that these faculties improve on these learning practices in order to improve learning among the undergraduates at the university.

Highlights

  • Education should fulfil the acquisition of all the parameters of quality education

  • As is the case with most higher education institutions, National University of Lesotho (NUL) aspires to create an environment that nurtures deep learning among the students as it is highlighted in the NUL strategic goal to transform the institution into “a university of choice providing high quality education” (NUL, 2015: p. 19)

  • Deep learning at NUL may be jeopardised by poor teaching and inadequate learning practices as well as personal and institutional factors (Tlali, 2019b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Education should fulfil the acquisition of all the parameters of quality education. These can only be achieved through quality teaching and learning. The National University of Lesotho (NUL) is the largest higher education provider in Lesotho It accommodates approximately 10,000 students (NUL, 2018). As is the case with most higher education institutions, NUL aspires to create an environment that nurtures deep learning among the students as it is highlighted in the NUL strategic goal to transform the institution into “a university of choice providing high quality education” Mokhethi, Malunga, & Thetsane (2019) identified students’ satisfaction dimensions These are the university environment and attractiveness as well as instructor and programme factors. Deep learning at NUL may be jeopardised by poor teaching and inadequate learning practices as well as personal and institutional factors (Tlali, 2019b)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call