Abstract
Monetary reform proposals can be characterized by their position taking on two fundamental debates within monetary theory: What is the nature of money (credit or asset)? Who should issue money (the state or private entities)? In opting for a radical departure from the hybrid nature of the current monetary system, reform proposals suffer from a gap between far reaching legitimacy claims and neglected functionality problems in monetary governance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
