Abstract

Grap2 and cyclin D1 interacting protein (GCIP) has been recognized as a putative tumor suppressor, but the molecular mechanisms underlying its anti-tumor properties remain undefined. Here, we report that GCIP is frequently downregulated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues. Binding assays indicated that inhibitor of DNA binding/differentiation 1 (Id1) interacts with GCIP in the nucleus. Ectopic GCIP expression in the highly invasive NSCLC cell line, H1299, inhibited proliferation, colony formation, invasion and migration, and increased susceptibility to anticancer drugs. Conversely, silencing GCIP expression in the minimally invasive NSCLS cell line, A549, increased proliferation, colony formation, invasion, and migration in vitro, and increased survival and resistance to anticancer drugs. GCIP also suppresses tumorigenicity of NSCLC cells in vivo and GCIP suppresses NSCLC progression is mediated in part by interfering with Id1 signaling, which was confirmed in conditionally induced stable cell lines. In addition, GCIP downregulates the expression of Id1, and GCIP and Id1 are inversely expressed in NSCLC cell lines and specimens. Taken together, these results suggest that GCIP is a potential tumor suppressor in NSCLC and that suppression of Id1-mediated oncogenic properties may be a key mechanism by which GCIP can potently suppress NSCLC tumor progression.

Highlights

  • Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide

  • Grap2 and cyclin D1 interacting protein (GCIP) expression is significantly downregulated in invasive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues To investigate the role of GCIP in NSCLC progression, we first assessed its expression in NSCLC gene expression data sets

  • These results suggest that GCIP plays a negative role in tumor progression and may be a valuable biomarker for NSCLC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. More than 80% cases are classified as nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is characterized by its poor prognosis and resistance to antineoplastic drugs both in vitro and in vivo [1, 2]. Boyden Chamber assays indicated that H1299/ GCIP-9 cells had markedly diminished migration and invasion, whereas A549/shGCIP-4 cells exhibited www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget profoundly increased migration and invasion, when compared with respective controls (Fig. 4A and B).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call