Abstract
In Gaz de France the ECJ held that an SAS does not fall within the personal scope of the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, as it is not listed in the Annex thereto. Furthermore, it concludes that the exclusion of an SAS from that scope does not constitute unequal treatment. The authors closely examine, and criticize, the rather restrictive approach that led to those conclusions. Subsequently, an overview is provided of the potential implications of Gaz de France.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
