Abstract

In NMR or MRI, the measured signal is a function of the accumulated magnetization phase inside the measurement voxel, which itself depends on microstructural tissue parameters. Usually the phase distribution is assumed to be Gaussian and higher-order moments are neglected. Under this assumption, only thex-component of the total magnetization can be described correctly, and information about the local magnetization and they-component of the total magnetization is lost. The Gaussian Local Phase (GLP) approximation overcomes these limitations by considering the distribution of the local phase in terms of a cumulant expansion. We derive the cumulants for a cylindrical muscle tissue model and show that an efficient numerical implementation of these terms is possible by writing their definitions as matrix differential equations. We demonstrate that the GLP approximation with two cumulants included has a better fit to the true magnetization than all the other options considered. It is able to capture both oscillatory and dampening behavior for different diffusion strengths. In addition, the introduced method can possibly be extended for models for which no explicit analytical solution for the magnetization behavior exists, such as spherical magnetic perturbers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.