Abstract

To what extent do transparency policies generate positive impacts? This seemingly rhetorical question has become the subject of increasing contention partly due to two research-based biases. First, researchers have been blinded by metrics and method. Using tools often ill-suited to gauging the gradual, diffuse, and indirect effects of most transparency policies, research has unsurprisingly found spotty evidence of impact. Transparency studies would benefit from greater use of complementary approaches, such as careful tracing of impact processes and indicators, combined with sensible counterfactual reasoning (what, without transparency?). Second, researchers have been looking for impact with blinkered vision. In particular, a thematic fixation on accountability and participation has monopolized attention. Key preconditions – such as compliance with and implementation of transparency policies – remain relatively neglected, as are other areas of potential impact, including capacity building, how actors are leveraging previously restricted streams of information, and transparency’s role in improving policy coordination and communication.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call