Gasoline price predictability: insights from consumer vehicle‐buying assessments

Abstract

AbstractThis study employs the random walk forecasts of US retail gasoline prices for 2001–2020 in order to investigate the potential usefulness of consumer vehicle‐buying assessments for predicting gasoline prices. We show that the random walk forecasts are free of systematic bias and imply symmetric loss, but they do not fully contain the information on consumer vehicle‐buying assessments. For instance, the random walk forecast errors fail to be orthogonal to the difference of opinion of consumers about whether the next 12 months or so will be a good time or a bad time to buy a new vehicle, and to the difference of opinion of consumers about vehicle prices (but not interest rates). In addition, the random walk forecast errors fail to be orthogonal to the change in consumer opinion about gasoline prices, fuel efficiency and poor selections (quality). Such findings remain unchanged when we use the ‘weakly’ rational forecasts of gasoline prices instead of the random walk benchmark. Put together, our results provide new insights into the potential usefulness of consumer vehicle‐buying assessments for predicting gasoline prices. We recommend forecasters pay special attention to such assessments when forecasting retail gasoline prices, since they can potentially help produce forecasts that are superior to both the random walk and ‘weakly’ rational forecasts.