Abstract

The educational use of daily-life contexts is considered a valuable strategy to promote meaningful science learning, since it facilitates the establishment of connections between previous knowledge, personal interests, and new learning. The aim of this work is to provide evidence to support the presence of gardens at educational centers, by assessing key science topics whose learning is promoted at the pre-school, primary, secondary, and university stages. To this end, we analyzed the paired graphic representations of “a garden” that students drew both before and after their participation in a garden-based learning program. Firstly, we obtained the frequency of appearance of every represented element, and afterward characterized the level of change between paired graphic representations. Sample size was of 24–19–25–29 pairs per stage, respectively. Across all stages, an overall improvement in students’ graphic expression was observed, which can be attributed to their experience in the space. At the pre-school stage, the garden favored the establishment of some simple cause-effect relationships which were consolidated at the primary stage, and provided a climate of motivation and affectivity that was evident in the final drawings, given the enormous quantity of details represented, the level of the finished product, and the careful combination and variety of colors. The presence of elements related to water notably increased in final graphic representations from pre-school, primary, and secondary education, thus evidencing that the use of gardens facilitates an approach to responsible water management. At the university stage, students initially demonstrated good knowledge of conventional agriculture, while the gardening experience -which was based on permaculture practices- helped evolve their ideas toward an alternative model of cultivation. The most prevalent science learning across all stages was related to plant knowledge, particularly to their anatomical traits and diversity. Finally, the role of educational gardens as models for students was evidenced, which suggests the importance of teachers and institutions carefully considering which model to offer. Overall, our results support the legitimacy of incorporating gardens to educational centers, particularly for promoting contact with live plants and plant knowledge, and potentially for promoting contact with garden fauna and activities oriented toward learning about it.

Highlights

  • The last 10 years have seen a clear decline in the number of young Europeans studying science, which is especially worrying in the context of today’s societies, in which science and technology play an essential role (Rocard et al, 2007)

  • The Rocard report warns that “the origins of this situation can be found in the way science is taught,” and recommends implementing renewed science teaching methodologies based on inquiry to promote students’ interest in science (Rocard et al, 2007)

  • In Spain, abundant research has been conducted on the lack of interest in science studies (Solbes et al, 2007; Rodríguez et al, 2011; Solbes, 2011; Robles et al, 2015). It has great implications regarding the training of future citizens who are committed and capable of facing technoscientific and social issues (Jocz et al, 2014), which in turn constitutes one of the main aims of current science education, beyond the purely propaedeutic (Acevedo, 2004)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The last 10 years have seen a clear decline in the number of young Europeans studying science, which is especially worrying in the context of today’s societies, in which science and technology play an essential role (Rocard et al, 2007). In Spain, abundant research has been conducted on the lack of interest in science studies (Solbes et al, 2007; Rodríguez et al, 2011; Solbes, 2011; Robles et al, 2015). Overall, it has great implications regarding the training of future citizens who are committed and capable of facing technoscientific and social issues (Jocz et al, 2014), which in turn constitutes one of the main aims of current science education, beyond the purely propaedeutic (Acevedo, 2004). An outstanding difficulty lies in the distance between science curricula and daily life: making sense of what they are taught is often very hard for students (Blanco et al, 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call