Abstract
Over the last decade theorists have begun to examine the political implications of Emmanuel Levinas's ethical phenomenology. Looking at Levinas's work as a whole, but with special emphasis on his major works, Totality and Infinity and Otherwise than Being, I argue that Levinas revives a Lockean state of nature politics, although with a novel and more compatible epistemology. Levinas's liberalism manifests itself most clearly in his concern for human rights, his fear of tyranny, and his use of a Lockean temporal scheme for political judgment. Both thinkers locate the source of ethical revolt in an abstracted apolitical past that represents the authoritative history of the moral individual. Levinas's "pluralism" is a return to a moral and metaphysical brand of liberalism partly at odds with deconstruction and other radical currents in contemporary social theory.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.