Abstract

There is evidence for differences in the gamma-irradiation response of different cellular lineages within the bone marrow microenvironment. We previously reported that heterogeneity is demonstrable in the gamma-irradiation response of five clonal stromal cell lines, derived from one human bone marrow specimen, despite morphological, histochemical, cytogenetic, and functional similarity. In the present study we tested whether one stromal cell line could affect the intrinsic radiosensitivity of another. Two clonal stromal cell lines, which display distinct gamma-irradiation responses relative to dose rate were used: KM 101, which shows the same radiosensitivity at a low dose rate of 5 cGy/min (LDR) and a high dose rate of 120 cGy/min (HDR) and KM 104 which shows significant gamma-irradiation resistance at LDR. To facilitate the study of the gamma-irradiation response of each cell line during cocultivation, we derived stable subclones of each, expressing the transfected neomycin resistance (neo-r) gene, which confers resistance to the neomycin analog: G 418. Introduction of the neo-r gene did not alter cell lines radiosensitivity. The results show that cocultivation of stromal cell lines before, during, and after gamma-irradiation induces changes in repair of radiation-induced damage, with a dominant effect of a resistant cell line at LDR. In fact, the radiation survival curves of cocultivated stromal cell lines were always characteristic of KM 104, and a dose rate effect was observed, even when KM 101 was present in large excess. Moreover, our results are consistent with preferential killing of the more radiosensitive stromal cell line: both LDR and HDR Do values of the neo-r KM 101, cocultivated with the parent KM 104 for 24 hr before, and during gamma irradiation were significantly lower compared to the neo-r subclone irradiated alone. The LDR Do value of the neo-r KM 104 cocultivated for 24 hr before, and during gamma irradiation with excess of parent KM 101, was significantly higher, compared to the neo-r cells irradiated alone.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.