Abstract

The relationship between general practitioners and patients is privileged. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance between the health profile perceived by the patient and the one described by the doctor. We conducted a cross-sectional study between 2019–2020. Patients completed the 5d-5L (EQ-p) and clinicians completed it “from the patient’s perspective” (EQ-d), also consulting the clinical diary. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 14 (Cohen’s kappa; Fisher’s exact test). The sample consisted of 423 patients. The mean age was 56.7 ± 19.2. There were significant differences by gender in usual activities, pain, and anxiety/depression (74.6% of men had no limitation in usual activities versus 64.5% of women (p < 0.01), 53.9% of men had no pain versus 38.5% of women (p < 0.01), and 60.3% of men had no anxiety/depression versus 38.5% of women (p < 0.01)). Physicians did not detect these differences. The concordance between EQ-p and EQ-d was substantial for mobility (k = 0.62; p < 0.01), moderate for self-care (k = 0.48; p < 0.01) and usual activities (k = 0.50; p < 0.01). Concordance was fair for pain/discomfort (k = 0.32; p < 0.01), anxiety/depression (k = 0.38; p < 0.01), and EQ Index (k = 0.21; p < 0.01). There was greater agreement for “objective “dimensions (mobility, self-care, and usual activities). A good doctor, to be considered as such, must try to put himself in the “patient’s pajamas” to feel his feelings and be on the same wavelength.

Highlights

  • Introduction published maps and institutional affilHealth is a multidimensional parameter related to bio-physiopathology.Nowadays psycho-socio-economic factors are considered as an integral part of citizen health in the context of advanced health policies [1,2]

  • The aim of this work was to evaluate the concordance of the two survey techniques conducted with the same instrument (EQ 5D-5L): the health perceived by the patient and the health profile described by the physician for that same patient

  • While there are growing interests in the study of physician empathy toward the patient [19,21,26,27,28], these studies are generally conducted with specially designed psychometric instruments: the Interpersonal Relativity Index (IRI), the Jefferson

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nowadays psycho-socio-economic factors are considered as an integral part of citizen health in the context of advanced health policies [1,2] This change in attitude has fostered the development of methods of measuring the phenomenon that value the individual’s perception of his condition, which is not limited to a mere analysis of clinical features [3]. These tools are increasing [4,5,6,7,8] and adapting to various purposes [9], from the generic ones to the most specific and refined. Since health economic policy decisions can no longer be guided only by the survival target, tools are needed to measure iations

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.