Abstract

We analyse the effect of managerial entrenchment on myopic investment behaviour and the corresponding response of shareholders using a two-stage signaling game model. From the dimensions of capability and job-switching costs, we categorize managers into three types: talented managers with high job-switching costs (M TH), talented managers with low job-switching costs (MTL) and untalented managers (M u). We determine a pooling equilibrium in which all types of managers prefer to select short-run projects under managerial entrenchment motivation. The results reveal that managerial entrenchment motivation and action will contribute to investment myopia. Furthermore, a partially separating equilibrium in which M TL select short-run projects but M TH and M u select short-run projects emerges if the optimal subsidy is given to managers. Meanwhile, shareholders decide whether or not to retain incumbent managers according to the project yield

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call