Abstract

Galileo satellites can broadcast signals on five frequencies, namely E1, E5A, E5B, E5 (A+B), and E6. The multi-frequency integration has become an emerging trend in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data processing. This study focused on the precise time transfer based on Galileo five-frequency uncombined precise point positioning (PPP), including the performance comparison of PPP time transfer with a priori and a posteriori weighting strategies, with different inter-frequency bias (IFB) dynamic models, and with the precise satellite products from different analysis centers, as well as the contribution of multi-frequency observations for time transfer. Compared with the a priori weighting strategy, the short-term frequency stability of time transfer adopting the Helmert variance component estimation method can be improved by 28.9–37.6% when the average time is shorter than 100 s. The effect of IFB dynamic models on Galileo five-frequency PPP time transfer is not obvious. When employing the post-processed precise satellite products from seven analysis centers, the accuracy of time transfer can be better than 0.1 ns, while an accuracy of 0.253 ns can be obtained in the real-time mode. At an average time of approximately 10,000 s, the post-processed time transfer with Galileo five-frequency PPP can provide a frequency stability of 3.283 × 10−14 to 3.459 × 10−14, while that in real-time mode can be 3.541 × 10−14. Compared with dual-frequency PPP results, the contribution of multi-frequency combination to the accuracy and frequency stability of time transfer is not significant, but multi-frequency PPP can achieve more reliable time transfer results when the signal quality is poor.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call