Gait biomechanics following lower extremity trauma: Amputation vs. reconstruction

Abstract

BackgroundSurgical advances have substantially improved outcomes for individuals sustaining traumatic lower extremity injury. Injuries once requiring lower limb amputation are now routinely managed with limb reconstruction surgery. However, comparisons of functional outcomes between the procedures are inconclusive. PurposeTo compare gait biomechanics after lower limb reconstruction and transtibial amputation. MethodsTwenty-four individuals with unilateral lower limb reconstruction wearing a custom ankle-foot orthosis (Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis), 24 with unilateral, transtibial amputation, and 24 able-bodied control subjects underwent gait analysis at a standardized Froude speed based on leg length. Lower extremity joint angles, moments, and powers, and ground reaction forces were analyzed on the affected limb of patients and right limb of able-bodied individuals. ANOVA with Tukeys post-hoc tests determined differences among groups and post-hoc paired t-tests with Bonferroni-Holm corrections determined differences between limbs. ResultsThe ankle, knee, and hip exhibited significant kinematic differences between amputated, reconstructed and able-bodied limbs. The reconstruction group exhibited less ankle power and range of motion while the amputee group exhibited lower knee flexor and extensor moments and power generation. ConclusionGait deficiencies were more pronounced at the ankle following limb reconstruction with orthosis use and at the knee following transtibial amputation with prosthesis use. Although both groups in the cohorts tested can replicate many key aspects of normative gait mechanics, some deficiencies still persist. These results add to the growing body of literature comparing amputation and limb reconstruction and provide information to inform the patient on functional expectations should either procedure be considered.