Abstract
The output of the accommodative vergence cross-link, the ACA ratio, was measured before and after subjects viewed through a telestereoscope which increased their interocular separation (pd) approximately fourfold. The initial paradigm was designed to force an increase in the ACA ratio in that subjects alternately fixated targets set at differing distances. In this paradigm, the varying vergence demands could not be met by a constant increase in phasic or tonic vergence responses. In a second paradigm, only one target was viewed at a fixed position from the eye. Now the constant vergence demand could be met by a set increase in phasic and/or tonic vergence. A significant increase in the ACA ratio was found in the two-target study but not in the single-target study. Increases in the accommodative vergence gain did show considerable individual differences. Tonic vergence changes were interpolated from the data. This parameter increased significantly in both cases but more so when two targets were alternately fixated. This finding is consistent with current near triad models which predict that accommodative convergence input acts along with disparity vergence input to increase tonic levels of convergence. When ACA ratios were calculated using clinical measures of the phoria at 6 and 0.4 m, increases were found in the two-target study and to a lesser degree in the single-target study. This clinical method of ACA measure appears to have been confounded by changes in tonic vergence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.