Gabapentin for chronic refractory cough: A system review and meta-analysis

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in the treatment of chronic refractory cough by Meta-Analysis. MethodsLiteratures were retrieved from PubMed, Embase (OvidIP), Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Database and China Biomedical Management System and eligible prospective studies were screened. Data were extracted and analyzed by using RevMan 5.4.1 software. ResultsSix articles (2 RCTs and 4 prospective studies) with 536 participants were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that gabapentin was better than placebo in cough-specific quality of life (LCQ score, MD = 4.02, 95%CI [3.26,4,78], Z = 10.34, P < 0.00001), cough severity (VAS score, MD = −29.36, 95% CI (-39.46, -19.26), Z = 5.7, P < 0.00001), cough frequency (MD = -29.87, 95% CI [- 43.84, -15.91], Z = 4.19, P < 0.0001) and therapeutic efficacy (RR = 1.37,95%CI [1.13,1.65], Z = 3.27, P = 0.001), and equal in safety (RR = 1.32,95%CI [0.47,3.7], Z = 0.53, P = 0.59). Gabapentin was similar to other neuromodulators in therapeutic efficacy (RR = 1.07,95%CI [0.87,1.32], Z = 0.64, P = 0.52), but its safety was better. ConclusionGabapentin is effective in the treatment of chronic refractory cough in both subjective and objective evaluations, and its safety is better than other neuromodulators.