Abstract

High quality images are necessary for correct interpretation of Ga-67 studies in lymphoma. The authors were interested if there is a significant change in the quality of the Ga-67 images using a newly introduced dual-head camera compared with a conventional single-head camera. The tomographic spatial resolution, full width at half maximum, was found to be 9.63 mm compared with 13.7 for a single-head camera. The volume sensitivity was 380 cps/microCi/ml per axial cm as compared with 333 cps/microCi/ml, and point source sensitivity was 5.6 cps/microCi compared with 3.8. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001), when using the threshold technique, in the number of counts per pixel over a wide range of volumes and concentrations in phantoms when the two cameras were compared. There was also a significant difference (P < 0.001) in Ga-67 uptake in lymphoma lesions in patients when the same parameters were used for both cameras when using SPECT. The average uptake in lymphoma lesions, using a dual-head camera, was 529 counts/pixel with a range of 112 to 1275 counts/pixel in different tumors. With a single-head camera, the average for the same tumor was 216 counts/pixel with a range of 59 to 469 counts/pixel. The high sensitivity of the dual-head camera enabled high-quality, whole body scintigraphy, including the limbs, in 20 minutes compared with the 35 minutes necessary for the single-head camera for images which did not include the legs. Whole body Ga-67 scintigraphy is shown to be important in patients with lymphoma of the upper and lower limbs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.