Abstract

AbstractThis article presents two deteriorating inventory models with constant demand and deterioration rates to determine optimal ordering policy under inflation and partial backlogging with respe...

Highlights

  • The inflation and time value of money have significant effects on the inventory system costs, especially in developing countries

  • This study extends Mirzazadeh’s work (2011) to develop two deteriorating inventory models under stochastic inflationary conditions by considering assumptions of internal and external inflation rates, partial backordering, and fuzziness

  • Comparison of the fuzzy models In the above presented models, Ta and Td as the interval of the time between two sequential orders, Ka and Kd, as a part of the inventory cycle with positive inventory level are considered as two decision variables which are obtained by solving the fuzzy average annual cost model and the fuzzy discounted cost model, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The inflation and time value of money have significant effects on the inventory system costs, especially in developing countries. Misra (1979) presented a discounted cost model with considering the time value of money and different inflation rates for the inventory costs. Yang (2012) presented a two-warehouse inventory model under partial backlogging and inflation with considering the three-parameter Weibull distribution for deterioration rate. Singh, and Kumar (2013) considered a deteriorating inventory model with partial backlogging where the demand rate is time-dependent and holding cost is assumed to be time-varying. Chakraborty, Jana, and Roy (2018) studied two-warehouse inventory models with ramp type demand rate, partial backlogging, and three-parameter Weibull distribution for deterioration rate under inflationary conditions. This study extends Mirzazadeh’s work (2011) to develop two deteriorating inventory models under stochastic inflationary conditions by considering assumptions of internal and external inflation rates, partial backordering, and fuzziness. C0 ÀC P1 for C ! C0 for C0 À P1 C C0 for C C0 À P1 where C0 and P1 represent the initial value of the unit purchasing cost and its maximum permissible tolerance, respectively

Notations The used notations of this paper are summarized as follows: j
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.