Abstract
Energy-saving and low-carbon technologies play important roles in reducing environmental risk and developing green tourism. An energy-saving and low-carbon technology scheme selection may often involve multiple criteria and sub-criteria as well as multiple stakeholders or decision makers, and thus can be structured as a hierarchical multi-criteria group decision making problem. This paper proposes a framework to solve group consensus decision making problems, where decision makers’ preferences between the alternatives considered with respective to each criterion are elicited by the paired comparison method, and expressed as triangular fuzzy preference relations (TFPRs). The paper first simplifies the existing computation formulas used to determine triangular fuzzy weights of TFPRs. A consistency index is then devised to measure the inconsistency degree of a TFPR and is used to check acceptable consistency of TFPRs. By introducing a possibility degree formula of comparing any two triangular fuzzy weights, an index is defined to measure the consensus level between an individual ranking order and the group ranking order for all alternatives. A consensus model is developed in detail for solving group decision making problems with TFPRs. A case study of selecting energy-saving and low-carbon technology schemes in star hotels is provided to illustrate how to apply the proposed group decision making consensus model in practice.
Highlights
The tourism industry has become one of the advantageous industries for developing the economy in China
In order to compare and rank triangular fuzzy weights obtained from triangular fuzzy preference relations (TFPRs) by using the computation Formula (24), a possibility degree formula is introduced as follows
This paper has developed a triangular fuzzy group consensus decision making model
Summary
The tourism industry has become one of the advantageous industries for developing the economy in China. Selection of energy-saving and low-carbon technology schemes in star hotels is frequently based on multiple assessment criteria and involves multiple experts or decision makers This implies that such a selection can be viewed as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem with a group of experts. Tan et al [24] put forward a soft consensus model of group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations, and used it to solve cooking method selection problems for decreasing organic pollutants in food of animal origin.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.